In politics and military planning, a war effort is a coordinated mobilisation of society’s resources – both industrial and human – towards the support of a military force.
Depending on the militarisation of the culture, the relative size of the armed forces and the society supporting them, the style of government, and the famous support for the military objectives, such war effort can range from a small industry to complete command of society.
Although many societies were retroactively perceived to be engaged in a war effort, the concept was not generally used until the last decade of the 18th century, when the leaders of the French Revolution called for the levée en masse and a general mobilisation of society to prevent monarchist forces from reclaiming control of the French government.
The concept was subsequently adapted and used by Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, especially during World War I and World War II. The term war effort was coined in conjunction with these efforts.
Refer to War Economy.
Although certain societies, especially nomadic raiders and mobile cavalry societies such as the Mongols, specialised in providing war-effort-like support for their armies, the idea of a specialised war effort that diverted supplies, means of production, and people to military support came into general use only with the increased specialisation of the industrial revolution. Previously, most military supplies were either common elements of the economy (food, clothing, horses) or specialised instruments produced only for war purposes by industries dedicated to the task (mainly weapons and military vehicles).
Moreover, in feudal societies, peasants, the great majority of the population, often perceived war as the business of the aristocrats and did not feel especially obliged to make an extra effort to help their country’s aristocracy win a war with that of another country. The modern concept of a state belonging to its “people” carried the concomitant assumption that war was everybody’s business and everyone, combatant or not, was expected to contribute actively to winning it.
Crossover use of peacetime elements of society and economy for wartime uses became important because of the scarcity of manpower and the large size of armies and specialised materials used for war production (rubber, aluminium, steel, etc.). The complex decisions involved in conversion to wartime use also necessitated organisation and a bureaucracy; the term war effort was coined to describe these collective tasks.
Implicit in the concept of war effort was that the entire society was expected to contribute in some way; this served the double purpose of improving morale as well as resource conservation.
A war effort was also used to help companies grow. An example of this was when the military would contract companies such as Boeing to produce war resources for them. That would eventually give room for innovation and technological advances for such companies.
Closely related is the concept of the home front – i.e. that civilians engaged in wartime pursuits (particularly, industrial production) are in effect also fighting the enemy on a “front” of their own, and that the result of their “fighting” (higher productivity, refraining from labour disputes, strikes etc.) might determine the difference between victory and defeat.
You must log in to post a comment.