Assessing the Evidence regarding Warm-ups for Military Fitness Testing

Research Paper Title

Warm-ups for military fitness testing: rapid evidence assessment of the literature.


Warm-up exercises are commonly used before exercise as a method to physiologically prepare for strenuous physical activity. Various warm-up exercises are often implemented but without scientific merit and, at times, may be detrimental to performance.

To date, no systematic reviews have examined the effectiveness of warm-up exercises for military physical fitness test (PFT) or combat fitness test (CFT). The purpose of this rapid evidence assessment of the literature was to examine the quantity, quality, and effectiveness of warm-up exercises for PFT and identify those that might increase PFT and/or CFT scores, as reported in the literature.


Literature searches of randomised controlled trials were performed across various databases from database inception to May 2011. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 50 criteria for randomised controlled trial designs, and studies were individually described. Subject matter experts summarised the results applicable or generalisable to military testing.


The search yielded a total of 1177 citations, with 37 fitting our inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular warm-ups increased sprint/running time, but dynamic stretching and dynamic warm-ups had the most positive outcome for the various exercise tests examined. Systematically, static stretching had no beneficial or detrimental effect on exercise performance but did improve range of movement exercises.


Selected warm-up exercise may increase PFT and possibly CFT scores. Further research is needed to investigate the efficacy of dynamic stretching and dynamic warm-ups.


Zeno, S.A., Purvis, D., Crawford, C., Lee, C., Lisman, P. & Deuster, P.A. (2013) Warm-ups for Military Fitness Testing: Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise. 45(7), pp.1369-1376. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318285c1b9.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.