Military Personnel: Military Concussion Research & the Return to Work Metric

Research Paper Title

“Return to duty” as an outcome metric in military concussion research: Problems, pitfalls, and potential solutions.

Background

“Return to duty” (RTD) is often used as an outcome metric in military concussion research, but is inconsistently defined across studies and presents several key problems to researchers.

Using results from the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center’s (DVBIC) Progressive Return to Activity (PRA) study, the researchers highlight problems with RTD, and suggest solutions to inform future efforts.

Methods

116 service members (SMs) were enrolled in one of two groups (pre-implementation and post-implementation of the PRA Clinical Recommendation [CR]).

Data, including the Neurobehavioural Symptom Inventory (NSI-22), was collected within 72-hours of injury (baseline), and at 1-week, 1-month, 3-months, and 6-months post-injury.

Analyses focused on three time points: baseline, approximate RTD date, and post-RTD follow-up, with RTD data captured via self-report and electronic medical record (EMR).

Secondary analyses included comparisons across PRA-CR implementation groups.

Results

Of those SMs (<50% of the sample) with both self-reported and EMR RTD dates, dates largely did not match (range 1 to 36 days).

RTD (either date) also did not indicate symptom recovery, with >50% of SMs reporting “abnormally high” symptom levels (i.e., NSI-22 total ≥75th percentile) at RTD, and over 50% of SMs reporting at least one significant symptom (i.e., any NSI-22 item ≥ 2) after RTD.

Conclusions

The data demonstrate challenges encountered with a RTD outcome metric.

Military concussion researchers should strive to use a well-defined RTD outcome metric.

The researchers propose defining RTD as a return to deployment readiness.

Further, researchers should utilise Department of Defence definitions of Individual Medical Readiness and Deployment Limiting conditions to increase specificity of a RTD outcome metric.

Improving the way RTD is captured will improve confidence that tools used after a SM sustains concussion are adequately informing RTD decisions.

Reference

Cole, W.R., Cecchini, A.S., Remigio-Baker, R.A., Gregory, E., Bailie, J.M., Ettenhofer, M.L. & McCulloch, K.L. (2020) “Return to duty” as an outcome metric in military concussion research: Problems, pitfalls, and potential solutions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 1-19. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1715484. [Epub ahead of print].

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.