Overground vs Treadmill Running: What the Difference?

BPFA, Run (1)Research Paper Title

Comparison of Lower Extremity Kinematic Curves During Overground and Treadmill Running.

Background

Researchers conducted gait analyses utilising both overground and treadmill modes of running. Previous studies comparing these modes analysed discrete variables.

Methods

Recently, techniques involving quantitative pattern analysis have assessed kinematic curve similarity in gait. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare hip, knee and rearfoot 3-D kinematics between overground and treadmill running using quantitative kinematic curve analysis. Twenty runners ran at 3.35 m/s ± 5% during treadmill and overground conditions while right lower extremity kinematics were recorded. Kinematics of the hip, knee and rearfoot at footstrike and peak were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients. Kinematic curves during stance phase were compared using the trend symmetry method within each subject.

Results

The overall average trend symmetry was high, 0.94 (1.0 is perfect symmetry) between running modes. The transverse plane and knee frontal plane exhibited lower similarity (0.86–0.90). Other than a 4.5 degree reduction in rearfoot dorsiflexion at footstrike during treadmill running, all differences were ≤1.5 degrees. 17/18 discrete variables exhibited modest correlations (>0.6) and 8/18 exhibited strong correlations (>0.8).

Conclusions

In conclusion, overground and treadmill running kinematic curves were generally similar when averaged across subjects. Although some subjects exhibited differences in transverse plane curves, overall, treadmill running was representative of overground running for most subjects.

Reference

Fellin, R.E., Manal, K. & Davis, I.S. (2010) Comparison of Lower Extremity Kinematic Curves During Overground and Treadmill Running. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 26(4), pp.407-414.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.